You have source documents, trace ids, media evidence, or policy snapshots that reviewers ask for later.
Pilot
Test rawctx with one workflow.
Bring one AI workflow. We will record the answer evidence path and test whether it improves review completeness across model runs.
Good pilot fits
Start with a workflow whose evidence is reconstructed later.
Use rawctx when review evidence is spread across tickets, traces, files, and model logs.
You have source documents, trace ids, media evidence, or policy snapshots that reviewers ask for later.
Your team is building an AI analyst, copilot, internal agent, or analytics workflow that needs reviewable evidence.
Possible starting points include subscription billing, revenue operations, customer support, ecommerce, finance, healthcare, and product analytics.
Pilot inputs and outcomes
Define the evidence boundary before instrumentation starts.
The pilot is scoped around evidence coverage and reviewability, not a production readiness claim.
- One AI workflow
- One evidence source
- One independent reference system
- Coverage report
- Missing and late findings
- Sample audit export
- Log coverage
- Evidence retrieval time
- Reviewer acceptance of the audit material
By default, the pilot sends hashes and references rather than raw evidence. Any broader data handling must be reviewed before it is added.
Moving from the pilot into production requires a separate security review and production scope.